Showing posts with label Freedom-of-Expression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom-of-Expression. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Activism, Heroism and a Puppy named Bolt - What India needs today

Krishnaraj Rao
Mumbai, Maharashtra

Yesterday, I saw a movie about a puppy named Bolt, who is conned into believing that he has super-powers that he uses for protecting the little girl who owns him. Midway through the movie, he realizes that he has no super-powers; he is just an ordinary, helpless puppy. He feels crushed by this realization.

So Bolt faces a choice: to quit? Or to believe that he is still a hero, and keep struggling against the forces of evil?

The thought that his little girl still needs a hero helps him make the right decision: keep fighting.
I think we activists face the same choice. India needs a hero; are you willing to try? Am I willing to try?

Yes, we are not cut out to be heroes. Yes, as individuals, we are full of weaknesses and limitations. But India needs heroes now. She cannot wait another 10 years for someone better to emerge. You and I are the only ones currently available. So we will have to say, "My motherland needs a hero. Yes, I shall be that hero, although I am weak, fallible and maybe even helpless."

We are trying to improve governance with RTI applications, PILs, advocacy, letter-baazi and other methods. Sometimes we feel that our actions are powerful. We feel confident and courageous.

And at other times, we are crushed by the realization that our methods are inadequate, our actions are weak, and we are helpless in the face of a gigantic corrupt system. And then we say to ourselves, “Oh, forget it! Activism doesn’t work. So let’s just return to living our ordinary lives, and forget about the nation.”

I have had such moments lately. Overwhelmed by my own limitations -- the many promises that I make to myself and others, but fail to keep – I sometimes think such thoughts. I think about withdrawing into my own private space again and gradually disappearing from the activist space.

My re-energizing moment - Picking up shit from the road

I want to share with you what happened on Friday morning, about 8.20 am. I was on my way to giving my weekly classes on ‘Creative English & Editing’ for Second Year law students at Vile Parle. In my bag were 4-5 old newspapers -- discussion material. After getting off the suburban train and climbing the skywalk, I had a prayerful thought: “God, take my hand, take my mind, make me serve. Tell me clearly what you want. I’ll do it, I promise.”

Minutes later, at the other end of the skywalk near SV Road, I saw a large lump of shit. I saw it and passed by. And then I passed by a fallen piece of paper. I then knew what I must do. I picked up the paper, went back to where the shit was, picked it up neatly and put it into a large empty flower pot by the side – out of everybody’s path.

I felt happy. I had prevented the shit from spoiling someone’s day. If the shit had lay there long enough, a few people in the crowd would surely have stepped into it, and then walked, leaving a disgusting trail, for at least half an hour. Maybe they would have gotten into a rickshaw or train and ruined other people’s morning. Maybe they would have walked into their offices, and struggled in the washroom for half an hour to get the disgusting stuff out of the treads of his shoes. Or – if it was a businessman with an appointment – he might have cancelled it and just gone home to deal with the mess.

I felt energized. I had made my country and my city a bit better. And it was easy. I could do it, alone, quietly.

I thought about the previous day -- Republic Day – when I had not done one single patriotic thing. Not one. I had not saluted a flag, not bought a flag from a street kid, not even watched the parade on TV, and not heard any patriotic songs by Lata Mangeshkar and Mohammed Rafi. I hadn’t even thanked anybody who sent me Republic Day SMSes. But today, I had justified my existence to my country and my beloved Mumbai.

Shit versus Personal Honour

However, as I turned the corner and neared the college gate, happy and self-satisfied, there it was again. More shit, a few metres from the college gates. Three or four large lumps of what looked like dog poop, right where people would walk.

Now I was in a quandary. Should I or shouldn’t do a repeat performance? I could easily ignore it and walk around it; after all, that’s what everybody else was doing. And why was it my problem? It was not. It was the job of the municipal cleaners, who may have come in half an hour. Or maybe they had come and gone, and this was fresh poop.

Some of the students walking in might be in my class. What would they think or feel, if they saw me bending and picking up poop with newspapers? Would they still respect me? I wondered.
I could not just walk away from it. I had no excuse; I was carrying a bagful of old newspapers that I could tear up and use.

And so, for the second time that morning, I picked up poop from the road. This time, I threw it into a corner where nobody would walk.

My conscience as well as my hands were completely clean when I went up to class. We read 3-4 news items from the papers, and wrote about them. And then, near the end of our two-hour class, I told my students about my activities that morning. Going into flashback, I also mentioned how an activist friend – Vinita Singh -- had scolded me over the phone, making me pick up my own dog’s shit from the road many, many months ago.

The collegians found the whole thing yucky, inspiring and hilarious… and yucky!

After we all had a good laugh together, and all the jokes had subsided, I asked them to write about it in any way that they wanted to. I explicitly gave them permission to make it a joke at my expense, or a fictionalized story or a factual account – anything they felt like doing.

Here are the pages from their notebooks: http://tinyurl.com/Students-on-shit-picking
I think they were definitely more witty and creative than usual. The headings are priceless!

Expressing our freedom with small acts of service

It’s not only about shit on the road. It’s about a lot of other things as well. There’s a simple way to improve our country, and it does not involve any special knowledge or skills. It’s by being alert and answering the call to action every time we hear it or see it.

Every now and then, driving along the highway, I see a rock left by a trucker who drove away after using it while repairing a punctured tyre. Or I see a divider block that has fallen onto the road.

Seeing this, I curse the carelessness of others, and drive on. And then I wage an inner battle. Sometimes – and not always -- after driving a kilometer, I tell myself that I too am equally careless. Because of my carelessness in letting that stone just lie there, a motorcyclist may have a bad accident while trying to avoid it in the darkness. I visualize his mother, his wife and his children after the accident. And knowing that I cannot face his family members if I have to, I take a U-turn and return to the spot. I roll up my sleeves and do the job that I wish others would do. I take the stone out of the way of motorists.

Sometimes I see drunkards lying with their arms and legs on the road, in the path of traffic. And I realize that it could easily be… God forbid, my father, my son or myself. (No, we don’t have drinks in our family, but that’s only by the grace of God.) And so I lift that person out of harm’s way, and make him lie down in a safer place. Yes, it’s a dirty job because drunkards lie in their puke and piss. But having dirty hands won’t kill me, but a dirty conscience might; I don’t know how to live with the thought that the person I ignored had his foot crushed under a car.

So what am I saying here?

What I’m trying to say here is: Let’s not get too caught up with the methods of activism. It may be RTI, PILs, letter-baazi and petitioning, agitating on the road, organizing dharnas and morchas, fasting, public meetings or whatever. It may be all of those…

Or it may be none of those. I think our power to change the fortunes of India comes from our ability to do a job – not because it will bring us honour and fame, but because it needs doing. Life gives each one of us opportunities to be heroes many times over in our lifetime. It gifts us the opportunity to save many lives by just moving a rock out of the way.

Yes, we will ourselves never know how many lives we saved, and how many tears we wiped by preventing the bad news from happening… and maybe that’s for the best.

“Ask not for whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.
Now this bell tolling softly for another,
says to me, Thou must die…

No man is an island, entire of itself;
Every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less…
Any man's death diminishes me
Because I am involved in mankind;
and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
it tolls for thee. . . .

- from Meditation 17 by John Donne

There is anonymity and humility in such activism. There’s no reward for our ego, no Padma awards and recognitions, no newspaper reports. Just quiet self-satisfaction for the soul, and the knowledge that when I was called to serve, I served. Isn’t that wonderful?

An important announcement for journalists of rural, semi urban and non-metro city areas

Ground Report India wants to motivate young Indian journalists and non-paid ground social activists of rural, semi-urban and non-metro urban areas for thoughtful, visionary and accountable journalism / citizen journalism.


If you as a journalist prefer to work on real ground to get sincere reports/articles/photos. You may earn money for your original reports,articles and photos, if reports/articles/photos are selected for publication in the quarterly print journal of Ground Report India group.

Good articles in Hindi could be accepted for publication after professional translation in English.

The payments for published articles/reports in Ground Report India may vary from 500 INR to 10,000 INR.


Coming Special Editions of Ground Report India quarterly print journal:
April 2012 Edition :  Indigenous and Tribal
Last date of Article submission : 10th March 2012

July 2012 Edition :  Electoral Reforms in India
Last date of articles submission : 10th June 2012


Note-
Ground Report India does not get grants, funds or donations to run its activities for ground and citizen journalism.  All expenses are met by the founder of Ground Report India.  It is not possible to pay for each article thus payments for articles are limited to print journal publication and for rural, semi-urban and non-metro urban areas.



Ground Report India (GRI) in Social Media:      

Thursday, January 05, 2012

THIS ONCE AGAIN PROVES THAT UNLIKE DEVELOPED NATIONS INDIANS GO BY MOMENTARY PASSION AND NOT BE HARD LOGIC :: Why Anna Hazare fell ????


Written By: 
Yogesh Pratap Singh
He is a former IPS officer and lawyer
Could be reached at- yogeshpratapsingh AT gmail.com

------------------

Anna’s fall was predicted by me in April 2011 in an article in Tehelka. New York Times and others in media are analysing the same now when it should have been done then. People did not believe in me. TV channels were so obsessed with Anna’s glitter that after they heard me speak negative about Anna in various forums, t...hey kept me out from all interviews and panel discussions. For, TV Channels wanted only those activists in the panel who praised Anna. This was despite the fact that I was the only old associate of Anna who sat in fast with him in the year 2003. It is sad that when there were such glaring dubious elements to the entire agitation yet people did not see it even when it was brought before them.

THIS ONCE AGAIN PROVES THAT UNLIKE DEVELOPED NATIONS INDIANS GO BY MOMENTARY PASSION AND NOT BE HARD LOGIC. ARTICLE IN TEHELKA DATED 30 APRILE 2011: CHASING A MIRAGE: Soon after quitting the service in an attempt to reform a corrupt system, I was disillusioned to see Anna Hazare’s love for the trappings of power Yogesh Pratap Singh Mumbai MUMBAI, 2003.

Starting 9 August — August Kranti Day — Anna Hazare was to go on a fast demanding anticorruption measures. At that time, I was a serving officer of the Indian Police Service (IPS) posted in Mumbai. I checked the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, and could find nothing prohibiting collaboration with anti-corruption activists. I decided to join Anna in his fast. It was a modest scene then. The press was active but there was no hype. Unknown people, mostly from rural backgrounds, comprised the bulk of Anna’s supporters. Very few intellectuals were to be seen. For a couple of days, I sat on the stage next to Anna. After eight days of fasting, the then rather unknown Right to Information Ordinance specific to Maharashtra state, which had lapsed earlier, got resurrected in the form of an Act. Some decisions were also taken to decentralise powers of gram panchayats. I had to face the music within a fortnight. The Maharashtra government shunted me to Nagpur and subsequent events resulted in my leaving the IPS two years on.

But I wasn’t unhappy. As a matter of fact, I was reasonably optimistic, though some of Anna’s close associates were not exactly inspiring confidence. Besides, his inability to grasp the complex dynamics of modern times was a limitation. I soon realised that my perception of Anna was a mirage. As reality descended, I felt disillusioned. That was why I decided not to join the crusade at Jantar Mantar. Many reasons, one after the other, kept me away.

My first shock came when I saw a person fighting against the government so enamoured by authority. If a senior politician or minister called up Anna, he would feel gratified. Soon thereafter, he started moving in government vehicles with red beacon lights. I rode with him once. After I got off at Dadar, Anna drove to the plush High Mount Government Guest House at Malabar Hill, meant for high-level dignitaries. Scheming people in the Maharashtra government resolutely wooed Anna.

Exploiting his quest for eminence, the government would organise meetings of IAS officers to be chaired by him in the sixth-floor conference hall of CM Vilasrao Deshmukh. A special room was given at Mantralaya for Anna’s people, who started using it as their office. In sum, Anna became an extra-constitutional authority within the Maharashtra government.

Obviously, notwithstanding the rampant corruption in the state, he was no longer a threat to anyone associated with the government. However, I still thought those were minor issues.

The point of no return was reached when Anna took information from me with respect to two cases.

First was the Adarsh Society case, where the involvement of two Central ministers, namely Vilasrao Deshmukh and Sushil Kumar Shinde, had become apparent in falsifying file notings.

The other was the Lavasa case, where the most startling revelation was that Sharad Pawar’s daughter Supriya Sule and her husband held a 21 percent share, and that these shares were allotted to them at highly undervalued rates. Anna spoke on the issue cosmetically, backtracking soon after.

He decided not to speak against the Central ministers from Maharashtra, whose involvement in corruption had become a matter of record. In his agitation at Jantar Mantar, where the world was watching him, Anna never spoke about Pawar and his specific role in the Lavasa scam. He also never spoke against Deshmukh and Shinde, which should have been done first, before the demand for the Jan Lokpal Bill was taken up.

Finally, think about these:
How could activists who would need to do a critical appraisal of the final outcome themselves become part of the Lokpal Bill drafting exercise?

Why was there not a single woman in his 10-member committee?

Also, where are Anna’s old associates?

The coterie around him ensured these questions weren’t asked.

----------------------------
Courtesy Source:
Madhu Rayala, USA

Friday, December 23, 2011

CHINA: Writer Chen Wei Sentenced to Nine Years in Prison

 23 December 2011

The Writers in Prison Committee (WiPC) of PEN International condemns the imprisonment of the writer Chen Wei. An honorary member of the Independent Chinese PEN Centre and winner of the Liu Xiaobo Courage to Write award, Chen Wei was sentenced on 23 December 2011 to nine years in prison for ‘subversive writing.’ The conviction is based on articles published on Chinese websites overseas. The WiPC calls for the immediate and unconditional release of Chen Wei.
 
Below is a report from the BBC on Chen Wei’s case:
Chinese writer Chen Wei has been sentenced to nine years in jail for “inciting subversion of state power”.
Mr Chen published several essays online calling for freedom of speech and reform of China’s one-party system. He was among hundreds of dissidents detained earlier this year after online calls for protests in China inspired by the uprisings in the Middle East. He told the court he was not guilty and that “democracy will prevail” in China, say reports. Mr Chen has always insisted he was simply expressing his opinions as allowed under the Chinese constitution. His wife told the BBC the trial had been “a performance” and that the verdict had been decided before it began.

The indictment against Mr Chen listed several essays he wrote for foreign websites on topics including pieces which criticised the political system in China and praised the growth of civil society.

The trial in Suining was held behind closed doors and lasted only two hours. In addition to the jail sentence, Mr Chen had his political rights taken away for a further two years. It is believed to be one of the harshest sentences imposed on those involved in the so-called Jasmine Revolution – the attempt to replicate the Arab Spring uprising in China.

Mr Chen’s lawyer, Zheng Jianwei, said that after the verdict was announced, Mr Chen told the court: “Dictatorship will fail, democracy will prevail.” His wife, Wang Xiaoyan, told the BBC she was “very unhappy” with the verdict.  “I think today’s trial is just a show. It’s a performance. The verdict had been decided in advance. They don’t allow people to speak. There is no freedom of speech.” She said his essays had been misinterpreted their meaning distorted, and he had done nothing to incite subversion. “He is a very patriotic man. He did criticise the Communist Party, but that’s stating the facts. That is not subversion.”

Mrs Wang, who was present in court, said her husband had decided not to launch an appeal, and that she respected his decision. “He said the verdict would be decided in advance and there is no point appealing. He wants to finish serving the terms quickly and come home quickly,” she said. “We have a daughter who is not even 10 years old. I need to slowly explain to my daughter why her father is in jail.”

Human rights observers at the court for the trial said there were a large police presence and that two activists had been questioned taken away.

Campaign group Human Rights in China (HRC) said Mrs Wang and other members of Mr Chen’s family have faced harassment from the police during his detention, and that he had only been permitted to meet his lawyers twice since he was detained.

Defence lawyers had been told to keep their comments brief in the courtroom, said the group, in a sign they wanted the trial to be over quickly.

Mr Chen is a veteran pro-democracy campaigner, having been jailed for his part in the student protest in 1989 which were crushed in Tiananmen Square.

He is also a sign signatory of Charter 08 – a manifesto for democratic reform that was co-written by Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo.

Mr Liu is serving an 11-year jail term for his role in producing the document, a sentence which has been widely criticised by governments and rights groups around the world.For further information see the following links:
 
News reports:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/23/china-jails-activist-chen-wei?newsfeed=true
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-16312065

Please send appeals:Calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Chen Wei, imprisoned by the P.R.China for the peaceful exercise of his right to free expression; Expressing alarm at the crackdown on dissent in which writers, journalists and human rights defenders are amongst those to have been targeted; Reminding the Chinese authorities of their obligations under Article 35 of the Chinese constitution and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which it is a state party.

Send appeals to:
His Excellency Hu Jintao
President of the People’s Republic of ChinaState Council
Beijing 100032
P.R. China

Director of the Beijing Public Security Bureau
MA Zhenchuan JuzhangBeijingshi Gong’anju
9 Dongdajie, Qianmen
Dongchengqu
Beijingshi 100740
People’s Republic of China.
Fax: +86 1065242927

Minister of Justice
WU Aiying BuzhangSifabu
10 Chaoyangmen Nandajie
Chaoyangqu
Beijingshi 100020
People’s Republic of China.

Minister of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China
MENG JianzhuGong’anbu
14 Dongchang’anjie
Dongchengqu
Beijingshi 100741
People’s Republic of China.

Please note that there are no fax numbers for the Chinese authorities. WiPC recommends that you copy your appeal to the Chinese embassy in your country asking them to forward it and welcoming any comments.

You may find it easier to write to the Chinese ambassador in your own country asking him or her to forward your appeal. Most embassies are obliged to forward such appeals to the relevant officials in the country. A letter or petition signed by an eminent member of your Centre may give make it more likely for your appeal to be considered. Similarly if your appeal is published in your local press and copied to the Chinese ambassador, this too may have greater impact.

See this useful link to find the contact details of the Chinese embassy in your country Chinese embassies abroad

**Please contact the PEN WiPC office in London if sending appeals after 22 February 2012**

Thursday, December 22, 2011

TURKEY: Year Closes with 30 Writers in Prison, Over 70 on Trial and 25 new arrests

22 December 2011

PEN International is deeply concerned that as this year closes, 30 writers are held in Turkish prisons, more than 70 others are on trial, and that there were 25 new arrests in recent days. This, alongside increasing surveillance, is having a chilling effect on writers and raises concerns for the coming year. PEN calls for a halt to the arrests, and the release of writers and journalists who are detained for the legitimate practice of their right to free expression, a right to which Turkey is committed under the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the European Convention on Human Rights.

PEN has on its records 30 cases of writers in prison in Turkey, and over 70 more on trial. On 20 December, a further 20 to 25 journalists were arrested. The most widely used legislation in these cases is the Anti Terror Law (ATL), a law that is applied so broadly that crimes of membership or support of “illegal organisations” encompass a wide spread of commentary, ranging from writings on Kurdish issues to allegations of inappropriate links between the police and religious figures. Over the past year, Turkish writers, publishers and journalists have told PEN that surveillance has risen markedly, and this, accompanied by the escalating arrests, has increased anxiety and is having a chilling effect on free expression.

Among the detainees is the well-known publisher Ragip Zarakolu who has campaigned for free expression for decades. He was arrested on 28 October and is facing trial under the ATL for “membership of an illegal organisation”, reportedly for a speech he made to the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) and articles he has written. Taken to prison the same day on similar charges is the respected academic and writer Busra Erslani. She is an expert on constitutional law and had been working with the BDP’s Constitutional Commission at the time of her arrest. Zarakolu’s son, Deniz, also an academic and translator, was arrested two weeks earlier for similar reasons.

Zarakolu and Ersanli were arrested under what is known as the Democratic Society Congress (Koma Civaken Kurdistan – KCK) operation that has been under way since 2009 and which has led to several hundred, some say over 1,000, arrests and trials. The KCK is seen as the civil/political wing of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). Among the organisations being linked to the KCK is the BDP despite the fact that 30 of its representatives took their seats in the Turkish parliament on 1 October. Among the early KCK operation arrests was Muharrem Erbey, a lawyer and writer arrested in December 2009 who is still detained, one example of the extremely lengthy pre-trial detentions. On 20 December, there were further arrests under the KCK operation that included around 20 to 25 journalists who were taken from their homes in various cities including Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir and Diyabakir. All are journalists working for various pro-Kurdish newspapers and agencies. It is not clear how many remain detained today, 22 December.

Other high profile writers in prison include Nedim Åžener and Ahmet Şık arrested on 6 March 2011 for being members of ‘Ergenekon’. Since June 2007 there have been a series of arrests of leading figures in the military, politics and police, as well as writers, academics and journalists. Now numbering over 200, they are accused of membership of a neo-nationalist organisation known as Ergenekon. Its aim is said to be to overthrow the government and it is linked to several assassinations. Åžener and Şık are detained for their research into and writings about Ergenekon. Åžener’s book, Fetullah Gülen and the Gülen Community in Ergenekon Documents is one of the sources of the charges. The Gülen movement is an Islamic organisation that promotes inter-faith dialogue. It is thought that Åžener’s arrest is linked to his research into suggestions that the movement holds undue influence in the Ergenekon investigation. Ahmet Şık has also written on Ergenekon and he too is said to have looked into the alleged affiliation of police to Gülen .

That two writers investigating Ergenekon should find themselves on trial for being members of the group they are researching is absurd, a view shared by 125 Turkish writers who, in November 2011, publicly announced their support for Ahmet Åžik by publishing in print his book that was seized from his computer files and banned. The writers had all played a role in editing the book, and are listed as co-editors and proof-readers, willingly making themselves liable for prosecution.

Writers are also among those arrested as Ergenekon suspects. One is Mustafa Balbay, a well-known contributor to the Cumhuriyet newspaper, an outspoken opponent of the government and secularist. He has been detained since July 2008 and remains in pre-trial detention three years later. Evidence against him is said to be notes he took during meetings with various figures who themselves were arrested under Ergenekon, and that Balbay was aware of plans to stage a coup, charges he denies.

Zarakolu, Şık, Şener, Erbey and Balbay are all members of PEN Turkey.

Among the 70 and more other cases of writers before the courts being tried under numerous and diverse legislations, are the obscenity trial against the publishers and translator of the Turkish edition of William Burrough’s Soft Machine. Also under way is that against the owners of another publishing house accused of defaming religion for producing a 2010 calendar featuring quotes from secular writers including George Bernard Shaw, Albert Einstein and James Joyce.

Please send appeals:-

Expressing alarm about the rising numbers of writers and journalists in prison and on trial for the legitimate practice of their right to freedom of expression;-
Referring to Turkey’s commitments to Article 19 of the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, both of which guarantee the right to freedom of expression;
Calling for an end to these arrests, the release of all writers and journalists held in prison, and an end to trials that contravene the right to freedom of expression;
Urging that there a review of all legislation that allows for the prosecution of writers and journalists and to bring Turkey in line to its commitments under international human rights standards.

Send appeals to:
Mr Sadullah Ergin
Minister of Justice
06669 Kizilay
Ankara
Turkey
Fax: 00 90 312 419 3370
Email: sadullahergin@adalet.gov.tr
Also to the Turkish ambassador in your country.

**Please contact the PEN WiPC office in London if sending appeals after 15 February 2012**

Monday, December 19, 2011

Russia: Leading journalist Khadzhimurad Kamalov assassinated




The Writers in Prison Committee (WiPC) of PEN International is alarmed at the killing of prominent journalist and newspaper founder Khadzhimurad Kamalov on 15 December 2011 in Dagestan. Kamalov, who had previously been subject to numerous threats, was gunned down as he was leaving the offices of his newspaper by a masked assailant. PEN calls on the Russian authorities to ensure that a full and impartial investigation in conducted to ensure that those responsible for the assassination are brought to justice.

Khadzhimurad Kamalov, the founder of the independent weekly Chernovik, was reportedly shot up to fourteen times by a masked assailant outside the paper’s offices in the Dagestan capital, Makhachkala, as he left work shortly before midnight on 15 December 2011. The gunman reportedly fled the scene by car.

There has been a long history of harassment towards the staff of Chernovik, with five of its journalists being arrested on trumped-up charges of “extremism” between 2008 and 2011. The newspaper has frequently addressed highly sensitive topics in the southern republic of Dagestan, in particular reports of police abuses in neighbouring Chechnya. The Centre to Protect Journalists (CPJ) also states that, in a recent television interview, Kamalov had made critical comments about alleged regional government corruption.

Kamalov had reportedly received numerous threats since founding the paper in 2003. Writing in the British Guardian newspaper, the journalist’s former colleague Nadira Isayeva said she was not surprised that Kamalov had been murdered, claiming that “Throughout my seven-year association with Khadzhimurad Kamalov I have been waiting for this day. The day they killed him”.

Please send appeals:Condemning the assassination of journalist and newspaper founder Khadzhimurad Kamalov.
Calling for a full and impartial investigation into the murder, in particular examining whether the killing was the result of Kamalov’s journalistic activity
Calling on the Russian authorities to live up to their commitments to protect freedom of expression under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and to ensure that threats against journalists are fully investigated as a matter of priority.

Send appeals to: Mr Dmitry Medvedev
President of the Russian Federation
Kremlin
Moscow
Russia
Fax: 7 095 206 5173 / 230 2408
Email: president@gov.ru


Mr Chaika Yuri Yakovlevich
Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
Ishaya Dmitrovka 1 a GSP e
Moscow 12599 3
Russia
Fax 7 095 292 88 48

Please also send copies of your appeal to the Russian representative in your own country.
A full list of all Russian embassies and consulates worldwide, along with contact details, can be found at http://www.russianembassy.net/

**Please contact this office if sending appeals after 31 January 2012***

Tuesday, December 06, 2011

Nowegian PEN - delegation denied entry to Belarus

In the early hours of Monday morning, 5 December, on arrival at Minsk airport in Belarus, a four-person delegation, three from Norwegian PEN – publishers William Nygaard and Trygve Ã…slund, and the Centre’s Secretary General Carl Morten Iversen – as well as Danish PEN board member journalist Niels-Ivar Larsen, were denied visas and consequently barred from entering Belarus. The delegation had planned to visit members of PEN Belarus, the Belarusian Writers Union, the Belarusian Association of Journalists and local writers and publishers. The visit had been planned months in advance.

Upon arrival at at 1 am, the delegation applied for visitors’ visas for a two-day stay in Minsk. The group travelled as tourists as this is the only way that such a delegation can enter the country. The group had received a formal invitation from a local travel agency. The visa applications, as well as air transport and hotel bookings, were handled by a local Norwegian travel agent specializing in Eastern Europe. All the paperwork was correctly presented to the visa officer at the airport visa office.

“The officer’s initial reaction upon presentation of my application and passport, was that he wanted to talk to the person who was going to pick us up and drive us to Minsk“, says Iversen who had organized the trip. “I called him and they talked. Obviously, this was not enough and the officer then wanted to talk to representatives from the travel agency that invited us. I called an emergency number without result. I also called the Norwegian travel agent who tried to help, again with no result. I told the officer that nobody picked up the phone as it was the middle of the night – 3 am local time. His response was that we should have arrived on an earlier flight.

The atmosphere at the visa-office counter was building as two ladies arriving from Macedonia not connected with the delegation got into a heated argument with the officer. After they left, the officer seemingly started processing our visa applications. At one point he asked for the visa fee and we gave a total of 360 Euros for four visas. After about 20 minutes, a lady in uniform arrived, took our passports from the officer, told us to stay and wait and then disappeared. After a little while we were escorted down to luggage reception to get our luggage as the airport was closing. We were then escorted back to the visa office. An airport or border police official, it was not clear which, then escorted us to a transit area were we were told to wait, guarded by a female officer. Very little information was given, but we understood that we had to wait until the morning departure flights. We would then be sent back to Norway and Denmark. Our passports would be given back upon boarding of the return flights.

No further explanation was given. At one point, a female customs officer who spoke decent English arrived and explained that this was the decision of the “consul” and the decision could not be challenged. She also said that the Belarusian authorities had the right to deny entry, while still claiming the visa fee.

We were kept in a place with no access to food or water. At one point, one of the members of the delegation who has a heart condition, said he needed water to take his medicine. The female guard did not understand and thought he wanted a doctor. After a while, a female doctor arrived and wanted to examine him, something he denied – he only wanted water. The incident lead to a heated discussion between the doctor and our guard. Around 6 am local time, two seats were available on the morning flight to Frankfurt, and two of the delegation members left. Their passports were returned at the gate. The two remaining delegation members left on a return flight out of Minsk at 3.30 in the afternoon.
Delegation member, William Nygaard told the Norwegian daily Aftenposten´s web-edition: “It is important for us to show the world what kind of regime that rules in Belarus – this is among the issues PEN is focusing on. Belarus is a UN-member and it is important that we react when they behave like this.”

PEN International protests the refusal by the Belarus authorities to allow PEN members to visit the country to meet with their Belarus colleagues, and demands an official explanation for the action.

Friday, September 30, 2011

What does India really need for Transformation ? Electoral Politics Or Live Sources for Self-Motivations of Masses


Editorial

Vivek Umrao Glendenning MCIJ
International Journalist, the Chartered Institute of Journalists, London
Member, Wikimedia /Wikipedia Australia
Member, International PEN
Member, International PEN Sydney Centre




For the past 20 years more or less, I have been in touch (active or passive), have been working or have worked with various known Social Personalities, Media Celebrities of Social Activism in India, known/ unknown Ground Activists, International Awardees, Mainstream Political Persons, RTI/RTF/RTE/ NREGA Activists, Activists of Gandhi's Ideology, Organizations of Gandhi’s Ideology, Groups/Individuals of Ideology of Violence and others in India.

Generally for the past one decade, I have been spending an average 6 months or more per year in remote areas of different regions. I try to spend a minimum 1 to 2 months in a region continuously being active with local people. By doing this I get opportunities to understand various types of persons, their views, their understandings, their problems and their reactions to ongoing systems. I feel that there are different layers of worlds in India and they are not mutually related, are not mutually understood and are not known to others.

I feel India needs fundamental changes in various systems with ground understandings of society and her segments. I feel that without completing the basics, actions such as running in Parliamentary Elections cannot be tools for the changes India needs.

India needs to understand why have her political systems been moving towards failures? Until the fundamental causes of failures will not be explored, India cannot move towards changes or transformation.
Social changes or Transformations always need lot of works, sacrifices of Individual Identities and egos, also cannot be done with shortcuts. It is like planting a tree; the tree needs care, water, sunlight, soil, nutrients and time then it starts to give fruits.

India needs to understand the holes in her Electoral, Political, Executional, Judiciary, Media and Constitutional systems. The changes need self-motivated movements from the masses of India and the masses can be motivated only by live sources of motivations. Live sources of motivations cannot be generated by Media. Even a responsible and social accountable media cannot generate live sources, the media can only support to strengthen live sources.

Individuals, who project themselves in Media as representatives or sources of motivations for changes/transformations in India, should be analyzed carefully not being biased and above of vested interests.

India needs fundamental changes in her social, economical and political systems. These changes should not be made or projected by markets or corporate bodies. Currency should not be the base of economy.
After political independence from Britain India always needed/ needs/will need to form an economy based on villages and basic structures of Indian society. India continued to use British execution systems and has been using, which were made to rule on India. Because of these major mistakes major percentages of common India do not enjoy freedom or independence.

Changes were made to show Sovereignty of India but basics of systems were not changed. Efforts were made for political powers in name of Independence. It was pre-assumed that with political powers everything will be changed and India will be better for all, but it never happened. In India people still think that only political powers can make fundamental changes thus they do not make efforts or explore possibilities other than electoral politics.

Since independence India could not form better needed systems because concentrations were/are only on political powers and electoral politics. By these mistakes, gradually the political power centers are being empowered continuously. The common person and public of India have become increasingly weakened even though Political independence was joint efforts of and for people of India.

Political independence was achieved after slavery of centuries thus social institutes and social education systems should have been formed parallel to the efforts for political independence.
These parallel efforts were not made because India had a tendency that everything can be done/changed only by political powers, still India has this tendency.

India could not form better systems even in many decades of independence by political power because political powers are strengthen in the cost of common people of India thus common people of India are weakened increasingly.

Jai Prakash Narayan led a movement for Total Revolution (known as the JP Movement) but again the same mistakes on the peak of movement were done - political powers as centers of Social changes and Transformations and a movement for Total Revolution was ended with formations of short term central governments. Did those governments transform any change? No.

Seeds and visions of a historical mass movement that could lead towards Total Revolution were damaged by historical mistakes and again unaccountable power centres were strengthened.

Power centres became more unaccountable for common people. These things have been weakening Democracy in India. Power centres do not feel fear from public and mass pressures, they are being increasingly unaccountable for the common public of India.

There is an emerging trend in India- Changes, Transformations, Revolutions all are being done in, with and by Internet. Even though in the virtual world of Internet it seems that too many efforts are occurring to change in India but things are being increasingly worse on ground. Internet is being misused by youth as medium for expressions of their reactions without doing sincere actions on ground.

In India it is easy to generate various pseudo power centers by projecting virtual illusions. Thus knowingly or unknowingly these illusions motivate people to move into electoral politics. These moves cannot change systems in India towards social accountability because they do not have bases of self-motivated real masses.

India needs decentralization of powers by empowering local civilian councils as policy making bodies and should have higher status than government officers and employees. India needs strong social institutions for policy researches, making and implementations.

Things should be done where they are needed, should not be done by projection or plantation of needs or by following others blindly.

India needs sincere efforts with long-term vision, sacrifice, unbreakable social commitment and ground understanding.