Monday, March 15, 2010


Maharashtra, India

Moved under articles 226, 12, 13 and 14 and also under article 51A of the Constitution of India and appropriate rules framed thereunder.

Dr. Leo Rebello, The Petitioner-in-Person
Residing at: 28/552 Samata Nagar, Kandivali East, Mumbai 400101.
The Union of India, through the offices of 
The Prime Minister and The Union Home Minister .. The Respondents

The undersigned being aggrieved, since 1991, that his name is not being considered for the Padma Bhushan continuously for so many years, inspite of several recommendations and having received no replies to various notices sent Re: irregularities, arbitrariness and/or corruption, is moving this Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, urging the Chief Justice and other Judges of this High Court, to take suo motu action on this important issue, in public interest, as this is not a solitary instance of discrimination as further reading will prove.

Justification for considering this Writ Petition as suo motu: When grave irregularities take place, it is not necessary for the Hon’ble High Courts or the Supreme Court of India, to wait for conscientious citizens to knock at their doors or when approached, as in this case, to stand on technicalities. May it be noted that the time is very short and the process may be put in motion. Later on, if required, the Petitioner may be asked to file a regular Writ Petition, which direction he undertakes to obey.

Brief Introduction of the Petitioner:
Dr. Leo Rebello is one of the seniormost qualified Naturopaths in India. He has trained and treated thousands since 1978, delivered over 10,000 lectures in 63 countries, including at WHO, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNESCO, UNEP, UNYO, IAEWP WONM, UN-Habitat and Medicina Alternativa conferences. He has been interviewed by the world media and received several prestigious awards. His original tome on “AIDS and Alternative Medicine” (which has gone into 4 editions) and now translated in Hindi has reached out to masses with the profound message “From AIDS Scare to AIDS Care”. Besides, he has written 39 other books on Nature Cure, Yoga, Holistic Healing, Tropical Diseases, Panacea for Pain, Cancer, Muscular Dystrophies etc. many of which have gone into multiple editions and his Nature Cure and Yoga Therapy book, 3rd revised and enlarged edition, has been translated and published in Turkish language (10,000 copies). His “Revised Oath for Doctors” and “Health Reforms” or scholarly articles “War on Your Health” are being circulated widely and have been translated into various world languages and read on the Radios, Televisions, in universities and at various conferences. He also has 31 years of experience in the field of social work, human rights, education (both formal and informal) and is associated with several NGOs in responsible capacities. He was the Special Executive Magistrate for 18 years and served on the Indian Film Censor Board for two years. Since 2004, he is also the World Peace Envoy and his recent inspiring book WORLD WITHOUT WARS has been nominated for Peace Nobel.

Locus: The petitioner's rights have been affected since 1991, when he was first selected for Padma Award, notified to that effect, and then his name was removed. As such, he has been discriminated time and again, impinging on his fundamental right under article 14. And he is not the only one to be discriminated thus. In essence, this is a pro bono publico petition.

Whether Notices served on the Respondents?: Yes. Four telling notices served are reproduced below for ready reference, with some public comments received. No response from the Respondents has been received till date. That further proves scant respect of corrupt authorities to law and justice. Selling awards is a big business in Delhi, both in the Govt. as also by ‘letter-head organizations’.

Brief Background of Padma Awards: The Government of India instituted on 2nd January 1954 four Civilian awards known as Padma Awards, namely, Bharat Ratna, Padma Vibhushan, Padma Bhushan and Padma Shri for exemplary contribution in the fields of Art, Literature, Medicine, Education, Social Work, Civil Service and Public Affairs.

The names of the Padma awardees are declared on Republic Day and the awards are conferred in second or third week of March at the Rashtrapati Bhawan, Delhi by the President of India. Till that time, technically, the names of the Award winners can be withdrawn or included, if grave error has been noticed.

The petitioner's name was recommended by several eminent persons for Padma Bhushan under Medicine category, for his monumental contribution to Nature Cure, which is one of the seven recognised systems of medicines in India and Mahatma Gandhi, Vinoba Bhave, Morarji Desai and several others have stood by it. Dr. Leo Rebello has taken on the mantle to spread this safer, cheaper, effective, reliable and ageold system of health care, and has served the nation well since 1978. He pioneered the first distance learning course in Naturopathy in 1978. More details can be found on his popular website:

Infact, the Petitioner NOT only deserves the Award for the outstanding contribution and original research in the Traditional and Natural Medicine, in which he is renowned all over the world as the Guru of Holistic Healing, but he could have been also considered for Literature (40 books, hundreds of articles, poems, reports and letters to editors written) and for Social Work, having dedicated himself to it for the last 31 years and helped thousands in all these years. Infact, under section 32 of the Advocates Act, the undersigned as a Human Rights Activist has helped so many, that his name was shortlisted as the Member of Maharashtra Human Rights Commission, but again, corruption being what it is, Shri Subhash Lalla, an Ex IAS, who was then working as the Principal Secretary to the then Chief Minister Shri Vilasrao Deshmukh was selected for vacancy reserved for eminent social worker.

The fact that such an eminent person is not selected on Merit, and the fact that so far no one has got the Padma Award for outstanding contribution to Naturopathy (category Medicine), itself proves how the selection process is faulty. Corruption even in Awards or for selection to appointments of MPs under eminent persons category (for which too his name has gone several times) itself proves how corrupt and discriminatory is the Govt. machinery.

1.. Dr. Leo Rebello fulfills all the basic criteria laid down for the Padma Bhushan Award. On Merit he should have got the Award long ago. But the fact that his name was first selected in 1991, he was notified of it on 23.01.1991 and then it disappeared from the list, and year after year he is being discriminated, itself proves mischief, incompetence or corruption in Awards selection. Infact, it is openly said that one can get the name included in the Padma Awards list for amounts ranging from Rs.10 lakhs to Rs.1 crore and the petitioner knows how certain persons have got these awards by paying or through influence.

2.. The Hon’ble Judges will surely be conscious of the facts how the Chief Minister of Maharashtra is now pushing the name of cricketer Sachin Tendulkar for Bharat Ratna, on the specious ground that “he is an eminent Maharashtrian Cricketer and even theMaharashtrian President being his fan will not have any objection to it”. What an abomination, inspite of public ire about the 2010 Padma Awards list itself. This further proves how the authorities show scant respect to principles of natural justice or contempt for even the Supreme Court Order.

3.. Through RTI applications moved by activists, through print and electronic media, and through the four explicit annexures reproduced below it is prima facie proved that there is corruption in Padma Awards list, and this Hon’ble Court has to intervene in timely manner by issuing appropriate writs in larger public interest and for probity.

Pending final disposal of this WP on Merit, the faulty list declared on 26th January 2010 be stayed and no award ceremony should be held in March this year to confer the said awards, until further scrutiny by this august court. Otherwise, it will amount to condoning the continuing corruption and discrimination.


Three tainted persons, namely, NRI hotelier Sant Singh Chatwal, Dr. Prakash Reddy of the Apollo Hospital, and actor Saif Ali Khan should be removed. Instead the name of Dr. Leo Rebello included in the Padma Bhushan list. This should not be difficult, as in the past, the names of Dr. Bindeshwar Pathak and Shri Kishorebhai Ratilal Zaveri were released on January 30, 1991. [Ref. Decision dated 10.08.2009 delivered by the Central Information Commission in Mr. S.C.Agrawal’s RTI appeal].

Similarly, the name of octogenarian Acharya Janki Ballabh Shastri, who has rightly turned down the Padma Shri shaming the Govt. for choosing his juniors much before him, may also be considered for Padma Bhushan on merit. If this is taken care of, the Govt. can save its face, but also the message will be driven home that in future such aberrations will not be tolerated by the guardians of law.


The Hon'ble Court may hold the Padma Awards list 2010 in abeyance and direct the Govt of India to constitute a committee under the Chairmanship of the Vice President of India with Cabinet Secretary as the ex officio secretary, the opposition leader and 5 eminent citizens of India, and the undersigned being the petitioner and who has studied the gaphla in the Padma awards selection since 1991, as members. This committee of 9 persons, within 15 days, should make an objective assessment and report-whether discrimination is practiced while conferring these national awards and to check if undeserving people have received these national awards or not. This Hon'ble court may then pass final orders on the basis of Report of the constituted committee referred to in this para. This will be swift, just and proper remedy, for which this Petition is submitted.

This Hon'ble Court is within its rights, jurisdiction and duty-bound to intervene to protect probity in public life and save the nation’s highest awards being given or sold to the undeserving, inspite of Supreme Court judgment of 15.12.1995. If this is not contempt, pray what is?

When the issue of Hotelier Sant Singh Chatwal’s name was questioned, as to how he could be given Padma Bhushan inspite of theCBI cases etc., it was expected that the govt of India will come out by listing exceptional and outstanding contributions made by him to the Indian society. But the GOI instead maintained the veil of secrecy by declining to disclose as to how the said individual’s name crept into the selection list, whereas, the said “award selectee” revealed the nexus when he adamantly and unwisely blared that he will personally come to receive the award since he is Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s man and worked on his behalf in the USA. Need we say more?

The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India had issued appropriate directions on 15.12.1995. Justice Kuldip Singh, who was part of that Bench, had observed: “the Padma awards have been conferred on businessmen and industrialists who have multiplied their own wealth and have hardly helped the growth of national interest”. These words aptly suit NRI Hotelier Sant Singh Chhatwal, as also Dr. Pratap Reddy of the Apollo Hospital, or Actor Saif Ali Khan. But even Justice Kuldip Singh had not envisioned the crimes that would be part of the grow-rich process.

May it kindly be noted that these prestigious civilian awards are conferred for exceptional and outstanding contribution to the Indian society, not because someone is a director of some big industry or a Multi National Corporation, like Ms Indira Nooyi, serving as CEO of PepsiCo, who was selected, last year. She may be the highest paid NRI in bankrupt USA, but what is her contribution to India? On the contrary, Pepsi and Coca Cola has not only ruined our businesses, but also the health of the younger generation.

The paramount consideration in preparing Padma Awards List is the person's “exceptional and outstanding contribution” to the nation. The contribution here should be taken as positive and proven contribution to the welfare of the people of India and not as personal record breaking performance, like in the case of shooter Abhinav Bindra or cricketer Sachin Tendulkar, because for the field of Sport there are other awards. Like one person cannot be held guilty twice, one person should not get two awards for the same feat.

"The Indian experience with regard to the Executive, Judicative and Legislative instrumentalities over six decades has been one of exploitation darkening into misgiving, misgiving deepening into despair and despair exploding into violence. The categorical imperative for stability in democracy is, therefore, to see that every instrumentality is functionally kept on course and any deviance or misconduct, abuse or aberration, corruption or delinquency is duly monitored and disciplinary measures taken promptly to make unprofitable for the delinquents to depart from the code of conduct and to make it possible for people, social activists, professional leaderships and other duly appointed agencies to enforce punitive therapeutics when robed culprits violate moral-legal norms."
Opined Justice Krishna Iyer about two decades ago.

Under article 51A of the Constitution of India, every citizen (that includes the petitioner and the Hon’ble Judges of this Court) has to perform 10 fundamental duties. Hence, this petition, which this Petitioner firmly believes will be considered with due attention. Suffice it to say that the Petitioner is NOT the only person discriminated by the corrupt regime and this petition may be turned into a PIL and the Hon’ble Court may appoint an amicus curiae to guide itself on finer points so that the society marches ahead by putting into effect Zero Tolerance to Corruption slogan.

I, Dr. Leo Rebello, age 60, proud Indian citizen, hereby solemnly affirm on 3rd March, 2010, that whatever stated in this petition as also the annexures are studied facts and submit this important petition for kind and urgent consideration of this Hon’ble Court, to prevent the law breakers from escaping the long arm of the law.

Dr. Leo Rebello
The Petitioner in Person
3rd March 2010

Column By:
Dr. Leo Rebello


  1. Since the Bombay High Court did not convert the Writ Petition into suo motu, Dr. Leo Rebello filed a regular Writ Petition (Lodging No.641 of 2010), on 18th March, 2010. And on the same day in the afternoon, Dr.Rebello, as the Petitioner-in-Person "mentioned" it before the Bench of Patel and Bhangale, JJ of Court no.49.

    For some queer reason, Judge Patel advised Dr. Rebello to appoint a lawyer (which is not necessary) and inspite of urgency Patel said, let the CJ decide. Dr. Rebello pointed out that the CJ only hears PILs and not regular Writ Petitions. But Judge Patel (usually a proactive Judge) assigned it to CJ and it was supposed to come up on Board on 26th March. But the Prothonotary and Senior Master of the Bombay High Court phoned to inform that the CJ was not available on 26th March and assured that the matter will come up on Monday, 29th March, 2010 before the Division Bench of Chief Justice and Dharmadhikari J.

    The Email sent to the Prothonotary and Senior Master is reproduced below. It speaks for itself.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Dr. Leo Rebello
    To: Adeline Rodrigues Cc: Bombay High Court
    Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:45 AM
    Subject: THIS IS URGENT

    Ms Adeline Rodrigues
    Prothonotary and Senior Master
    Bombay High Court

    Dear Adeline:

    1.. This has reference to our telephonic talk yesterday night, upon my return from Chennai.

    2.. Since you said that CJ of BHC is not available today (26th March), there is no point in my attending the Court today.

    3.. I will accordingly notify the prominent activists, lawyers, journalists interested in this case to attend on Monday, 29th March, 2010.

    4.. I suggest that you direct your assistants to get my petition numbered and list it on Board for URGENT Admission on Monday, 29th March, 2010 before the DB of Chief Justice and Dharmadhikari, J.

    5.. The matter can be brought on board on the Lodging Number basis also.

    6.. Please see if it could be High on Board, as the matter is URGENT.

    7.. Since you yourself verified my WP and commented that it is very crisp and neat, I do not think there should be any objections. In any case, I undertake to remove objections, if any, on Monday, 29th March.

    Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.
    Regards, Leo

    Dr. Leo Rebello
    World Peace Envoy
    Tel. 28872741

    The petition as displayed above and the WP filed by Dr. Rebello is more or less the same. Space permitting please also upload the Exhibits so that people can get an idea of how much there is corruption in even the National Awards. People will also get guidance on how to fight cases without engaging lawyers.

    Incidentally, not only one can argue one's own cases, but u/s 32 of the Advocates Act, one can also represent others, even though you are not a lawyer.


    I had earlier heard of Board Fixing Racket in all Courts. Now here is the proof how the Bombay High Court manipulates.

    I filed the Writ Petition (702/2010) on 18th March. As soon as I got the lodging number (641/2010), I mentioned the matter before the Bench of JN Patel & AD Bhangale, JJ. Justice Patel for some queer reason said "Not Before Me", while Justice Bhangale kept mum.

    The Prothonotary and Senior Master informed me telephonically that the matter will not come up on 26th March (the date fixed) since Chief Justice was absent on that day, the papers will be presented to him on Monday, 29th March.

    Accordingly, I attended the Court on 29th March morning to press for urgent hearing. My papers were not presented. So, I made a written request and mentioned this on 29th March, at 3.00 PM before the Bench of CJ Anil Dave and C.S.Dharmadhikari, J. The Chief Justice said, I should give a written application and he will look into it. I told him in the open Court since the matter was urgent I was mentioning it. But he said I should put my request in writing. I said in the Precipe it is already written as to the urgency. But he was insistent that I give in writing. So I again gave in writing that the matter should be heard before 31st March.

    In spite of that, the Court deliberately fixed 6th March, and I was informed yesterday evening (after the Award function of the first batch), that the matter has been assigned to Deshmukh and Kingaonkar, JJ and kept on Board on 6th April.

    This was done, I boldly say, to manipulate so that the Awards can be granted and my petition which, inter alia, prayed for stopping of the Awards ceremony and canceling the list becomes infructous (legal jargon for unfruitful or in other words defeating the purpose).


    Briefly this is how the corrupt UPA Govt. sabotaged the three Writ Petitions on Padma Awards.

    Chennai (February, the first petition) -- CJ of Chennai High Court asked the advocate of the petitioner: "Why have you made people like Saif, Chhatwal the respondents when the Writ does not lie against them"? The CJ of the Madras High Court offered to forward the petition, after dismissing it to the Union Home Ministry. The concerned petitioner's advocate said no to that offer. The advocate himself told me this in February when I was in Chennai. CJ Gokhale of the Madras High Court was elevated to Supreme Court of India, maybe in regular course, but the sword of suspicion hangs on his head.

    Delhi -- the Judge hearing the petition said to the petitioner "bring evidence against Chhatwal".

    It is like saying bring evidence against the politicians, bureaucrats and judges having Swiss bank accounts. Is it the job of the citizen or the state to investigate? Don't the courts have sub poena powers? Then deliberately posted the said petition for hearing on 5th April and dismissed it as per the instructions received from the Law and Justice Ministry of the corrupt UPA Govt. The concerned Judge who heard that petition has been transferred as the Acting CJ in place of CJ Dinakaran against whom enquiry is on. If Dinakaran is absolved (anything is possible in India) then he will go to SCI. Otherwise, this CJ sent to replace Dinakaran may well get promotion to the SCI for helping the Govt. to save the face on Padma Awards fraud.

    Mumbai -- I first sent a letter petition to the CJ of BHC, on 3rd March, after sending notices to the authorities concerned, with a request to turn it into a suo motu writ petition. The draft of that petition is in public domain and has been read by millions so far and appreciated. The Court wrote to me: "seek relief before the appropriate forum". Accordingly, a foolproof petition was filed on 18th March in the BHC -- the appropriate forum. It was deliberately delayed and inspite of my pressing (in writing) for an urgent hearing before 31st March, the CJ of BHC kept it for hearing on 6th April, thereby making the whole exercise infructuous.

    On 6th April eventhough the WP was on board, no one was ready to hear it since the Addl. Solicitor and his gang of black coats were howering around. I had to fight with 3 benches to hear me and finally Justice Daga rejected it (a) after first saying he does not wish to hear the petition last minute; (b) then hearing it with an intention to defeat me, which became clear (c) when he asked me twice whether I trusted him?; (d) then rushing me through the arguments, and (e) finally rejecting it on a flimsy ground without recording truthfully my arguments and counter arguments, while Justice Tated, was all along listening to me with rapt attention and his body language said that he did not agree with Daga J. But on division bench I have seen, the senior judge dictates, the other judge only nods like in Satyanarayan Pooja, wife touches the elbow of the husband when offerings are made. See below my letter to Addl. Solicitor General of India, so that you get better picture.

    Now the CJ of Bombay High Court is being elevated to the SCI because of his proximity to the Collegium since he is one of the members of the Dinakaran Enquiry Panel. His will be the shortest tenure in Mumbai and may be entered in Limca Book of Record.

    I would like to ask CJ Anil Dave and other judges -- do you see your promotion like IITs and MBAs as Career Option/Growth or as an opportunity to do justice? ... Dr. Leo Rebello


Ground Report India publishes articles as they are given. Ground Report India is not responsible for views of writers, critics and reporters. For any contradiction, please contact to the author.

Please give your Name, Email, Postal Address and Introduction with comment.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.